When I first applied for DLA I was refused. I challenged this in a 2 ½ page letter that took me two weeks to write, explaining why the decision maker was wrong. Essentially everything the decision maker had wriiten was wrong.
On mobility related issues, the decision maker said I could walk reasonably and slowly for three minutes. The form I had filled in had various questions with tick boxes:
How well do you walk?
- reasonable (e.g. slight limp),
- poor (e.g. shuffle, heavy limp, stiff , balance problems),
- very poor (e.g. dragging leg, stagger, need physical support)
How fast do you walk?
- normal (> 60m/min),
- slow (40-60m/min),
- very slow (<40m/min)
I had ticked poor and very slow, and then explained in the text box that I shuffle, sometimes limp, and have problems with balance. I think I mentioned weakness as well. For the question, ‘how far can you walk (including any short stops) before you feel severe discomfort?’ I answered, 100m. I explained that it took me three minutes to walk this far. I also explained that I can only do this once in a day. After that I am restricted to below 50m; any more and I would end up with increased weakness and pain and would worsen my overall state of health.
I don’t know where the decision maker got reasonably or slowly from. I explained this in my letter, and so the reconsideration removed ‘reasonably’ and ‘slowly’ from the list of reasons why I don’t qualify for higher rate mobility. But my ‘ability’ to walk for three minutes remained.
To me this suggests a major failing in the criteria for DLA. To qualify for higher rate DLA, a person must be unable to walk at all, able to walk only a short way without severe discomfort, or would become very ill if walking was attempted. This is very high criteria: moderate discomfort is irrelevant – it has to be severe; short breaks in walking are irrelevant – they have to be long breaks; very slow walking doesn’t matter – if you can cover more than 50m, you can walk, regardless of how long it takes; repeatability doesn’t matter – if you can do it once, it doesn’t matter how restricted you are after that; if walking too much (in my case, covering over 50m in one go – ignoring ‘short’ breaks – more than once in a day) makes you more ill, it doesn’t count – it has to make you ‘very’ ill.
So despite the fact that I am a wheelchair and mobility scooter user, I don’t get higher rate mobility. Not only this, but despite the fact that I cannot go out alone (except on a few local roads with my mobility scooter, which is too big to go on public transport) because I need someone to push my wheelchair, I don’t get lower rate mobility either. This is because ‘guidance or supervision from another person’ refers only to behavioural problems, difficulties arising from being deaf or blind in a unfamiliar place, problems with talking to others or needing someone to keep an eye on you. ‘Guidance or supervision’ does not include needing someone with you because of physical difficulties with walking.
Because I don’t get higher rate mobility, I also can’t get a Blue Badge. But if I wish to go out somewhere in a car, I will also have my wheelchair in the back of the car for use at the destination. This has to be got out of the car, on a road or in a car park, in order for me to be able to use it. I have had multiple problems with doing this without the benefit of being able to park in a disabled space. Sometimes the available parking spaces are very narrow, such that it is vastly easier to park by reversing in; but this would mean being unable to get the wheelchair out of the back. So the wheelchair has to be got out first – in the car park, not in a space, with other cars trying to get past. Other times the car park is very busy with cars and people, and getting the wheelchair out whilst cars drive past is difficult. When I am especially tired, I want the wheelchair to be brought round to the side of the car so that I can get straight in from the chair. This isn’t possible if there is a car in the adjacent space; there simply isn’t room.
So I can’t get out on my own, and I can’t get out without physical support (i.e. a wheelchair or mobility scooter) but I don’t get any financial assistance with this. Despite the time costs to the person who drives me somewhere or pushes my wheelchair, despite the costs of taxis, despite the extra cost of tickets because I need someone with me to get on public transport, despite the cost of purchasing, maintaining and insuring a wheelchair and mobility scooter, despite these costs and despite the fact that DLA is supposed to help with these extra costs that are experienced by people with disabilities, I don’t get any financial help.
 Other criteria for this are: being a double amputee, being blind or get higher rate care with severe mental impairment and severe behaviour problems.